hungry carnivores wrote:
Exactly @bob beer. Great point here. All the time, I hear of blasphemy like "put lime in your media" and "put travertine shavings in your media" from some of the big guys, and while the plant can tolerate it, it's not really necessary. Peat/Perlite/Sand is just fine.
Well, I’m not sure I’d call it “blasphemy.”
You can’t have blasphemy without ban orthodoxy, and it’s so easy to fall into that trap. The only way to know if adding like or gypsum will help or not, is to do it and see. And I know people who’ve had really good results with lime. I just sometimes roll my eyes when I see someone have success with a particular thing and claim that it’s absolutely necessary, without considering other variables too.
Personally I’d love to have the space to grow different species side by side in a variety of substrates and see which do best. After all, specialty growers of all kinds of plants, who do have the room, do this to get the biggest and best, and we benefit from all that work. I know of one very knowledgeable grower who’s having such good results growing pings in pure perlite that he’s considering switching completely. 5 years ago I would not have thought I’d be growing seeds in flats of pure cactus and succulent soil. I wouldn’t have thought I’d see Sarracenias growing beautifully in pure crushed pumice.
All I can say for sure about substrates is (once again, my experience) is that when I had random plants go down with brown heart, they were in mixes that contained a large proportion of quartz sand, and held water in a way that it looked visibly wet. I guess the surface tension was just that way. Maybe that made it easier for nematodes to thrive and/or get around, or (probably more likely) for the Fusarium spores to spread more easily via tray water. So whatever else I do, I generally try for a mix that conducts water but also provides some air flow.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk